'This isn't over' | Industry watcher warns on Trump versus Revolution Wind

Analyst said while the court ordered construction restart is a boost, the president’s hostility continues to threaten both offshore wind farm project and sector

US President Donald Trump
US President Donald TrumpPhoto: White House

Monday's court ruling enabling construction restart of Orsted’s massive Revolution Wind offshore wind project is a boon to the developer and the industry, but experts warn “this isn’t over yet” given President Donald Trump’s ongoing hostility.

It’s “fantastic” that Orsted can now finish the project, said Philip Totaro, CEO of research consultancy IntelStor. But “this isn’t over yet,” he warned.

The government could appeal the decision and pending litigation against the project “could expose them to construction being halted again, but for non-compliance with other permits that were issued,” he said.

The 704MW project split between Connecticut and Rhode Island was hit with a sudden stop work order last month by Trump’s Department of the Interior (DoI) on “national security" and other concerns.
Owned by an Orsted and Global Infrastructure Partners joint venture (JV), Revolution was approved in 2023, was 80% complete, and considered safe from the president's rage.

While Trump's Inauguration Day memorandum put approved projects under review with a goal of termination, industry watchers widely assumed those in advanced construction would move forward. The stop work order trashed that confidence.

The JV hit back with a suit earlier this month in federal District Court for the District of Columbia (Washington, DC) seeking a preliminary injunction against it, which was granted.

Analysts were impressed with the strength of Judge Royce Lamberth’s comments during Monday’s hearing.

Lamberth slammed Department of Justice (DoJ) attorneys for their inconsistent justifications for the order, describing them as “the height of arbitrary and capricious”, and criticized the lack of evidence for national security concerns. DoJ defends the government in litigation.

Orsted said the project was losing at least $25m a week, split between the partners, with costly vessels and specialized workers idled.

Lamberth agreed that cancellation of the $5bn project and $1bn in penalties would do “irreparable harm” to the partners, which stood to earn $200-$250m annually from its power purchase agreements.

Roald Hartvigsen, vice president at Clarksons Securities said, “the strength of the court’s language exceeds expectations and, in our view, provides increased confidence that the Revolution Wind project will be allowed to reach completion.”

Judge Lamberth was appointed by former Republican President Ronald Reagan in 1987.

Signe Sorensen, senior analyst and Americas lead for research intelligence firm Aegir Insights, said the ruling “greatly increases confidence that the projects in construction will go ahead.”

This “makes it likely that there is an offshore wind sector, however small and inactive, in the US post-Trump,” she added.

Despite the promise, neither the project nor the industry are in the clear.

Risks continue

The Trump administration hasn’t “gotten a commitment for natural gas purchases from the governors of CT, [Connecticut] MA [Massachusetts] and RI [Rhode Island] as a result of this, which was their intent when they issued the stop work order,” claimed Totaro.

The administration halt of Equinor's 810MW Empire wind last April was an early sign that even projects under construction could be stopped.

The project was allowed to restart four weeks later, with many claiming New York governor Kathy Hochul's greenlighting of a controversial natural gas pipeline was the deciding factor, a claim Hochul denies.

Revolution also faces litigation including the suit by activist group Green Oceans that sparked the stop work order.

EDF’s Atlantic Shores was also derailed by presidential review instigated by a lawsuit. The administration's push to remand permits for US Wind’s Maryland arrays and Ocean Winds’ SouthCoast projects also stem from litigation.

DoI responded to the DC District Court's ruling by stating its coastal regulator Bureau of Ocean Energy Management will continue “its investigation into possible impacts by the project to national security and prevention of other uses on the Outer Continental Shelf.”

DoI “remains committed to ensuring that prior decisions are legally and factually sound,” Interior secretary Doug Burgum said.

Burgum was recently quoted admitting that offshore wind has “no future” under Trump.
(Copyright)
Published 24 September 2025, 08:01Updated 24 September 2025, 08:01
AmericasUSOrstedGlobal Infrastructure PartnersEquinor