'Why not?' | What Western wind giants say about using Chinese turbines

Several of Europe’s leading offshore wind farm developers have signalled cautious openness to the Chinese

Mingyang plans to open a £1.5bn factory in Scotland to produce fixed bottom and floating offshore wind turbines for the UK and Europe.
Mingyang plans to open a £1.5bn factory in Scotland to produce fixed bottom and floating offshore wind turbines for the UK and Europe.Photo: Photo by Visual China Group via Getty Images

With Mingyang confirming plans to open a UK offshore wind turbine factory, the attitude of Western developers to buying Chinese machines has taken on renewed importance. So what have giants like RWE, Iberdrola and Orsted said on the topic? We take a look.

Eighteen months after it emerged a Mingyang plan for a UK factory was on a shortlist of ‘priority’ projects to support Scotland’s offshore wind growth, the Chinese wind giant confirmed on Friday that it wants to move ahead with the facility.

Mingyang revealed details of a three-phase project that will involve investing up to £1.5bn ($2bn) in a factory for offshore and floating offshore projects for the UK and for export.

This plan, it must be stressed, remains subject to UK government approval. But if it does go ahead, the willingness of Western wind developers to buy Chinese machinery will be under more scrutiny than ever.

There are a range of concerns about the use of Chinese wind turbines in Europe, most of which boil down to: security, supply chain and subsidies.

Cash-strapped developers, however, have different concerns – most namely their bottom lines in a squeezed offshore wind market.

Deepak Chinnapa, director at renewables consultancy Brinckmann Group, said that Western developers do “entertain” Chinese wind suppliers – not least so they can “negotiate on price” with Western turbine makers.

Chinese onshore wind turbines are already “used extensively” in another Western market, Australia, he notes. However, there is “more scrutiny” for offshore projects around certification and compliance.

So what have Western offshore wind developers said themselves on the matter? For the most part, they have remained tight-lipped around their attitude to Chinese turbines and a handful of the biggest names did not respond to a request to comment on Mingyang's factory plan.

But occasionally their top managers have spoken out about the prospect of using Chinese turbines over the years. Below, we round up what a clutch of the biggest names in the Western market have said about the issue.

Orsted: ‘We reject nothing’

Mads Nipper, then-chief executive at Denmark’s Orsted, said last year that the West’s leading offshore wind developer would not rule out using Chinese wind turbines in the future.

However, it is not just a matter of cost, he cautioned, adding that technology, quality and commercial factors are all considerations – as well as any regulatory risks.

“We keep an open mind,” said Nipper. “We reject absolutely nothing in this supply chain.”

Nipper added that Orsted has “obviously followed with interest the developments that we have seen, both in Italy and in Germany,” in a seeming reference to agreements Mingyang had struck to supply offshore wind farms in both countries.

More recently, Orsted bemoaned the “scarcity” of Western offshore wind turbine suppliers now only Vestas and Siemens Gamesa are taking new orders. It added that this scarcity “exposes Orsted to certain risks, including the ability to contract with these suppliers on acceptable terms, or at all.”
RWE CEO Markus Krebber has warned of a choice between buying Chinese turbines or delaying the energy transition.Photo: Aurora Energy Insights

RWE: ‘Risk of delaying wind power rollout without Chinese’

German power giant RWE has given somewhat mixed signals about its openness to using Chinese machines.

Its offshore wind chief Sven Utermöhlen visited Mingyang facilities in China last year to “build relationships” with the OEM – even sporting a Mingyang hardhat in a picture posted on LinkedIn.

Utermöhlen cited China’s leadership in offshore wind deployment as a “compelling reason” for him to visit and see what the country’s suppliers “can offer”.

RWE CEO Markus Krebber warned in 2023 that, unless Europe ramps up its wind power supply chain, it will “face the question [to] either delay the energy transition or buy, in the case of wind turbines, Chinese turbines.”
Last November, however, he was quoted in Bloomberg saying: “I would never buy an offshore turbine manufactured in China because it has lead times of five years.”

Of course, if Mingyang builds a UK factory, the turbines won’t have to come from China.

Iberdrola: ‘We must engage with all suppliers’

“Why not?” This was the response of Iberdrola’s international offshore wind business director Javier Garcia when asked by Recharge back in 2022 if the Spanish renewables giant would use Chinese turbines.

Garcia said Iberdrola must “engage with all [turbine suppliers] because it is a global market.”

Indeed, Garcia said Iberdrola was in talks over “small agreements with some Chinese turbine suppliers” for offshore machines – although it appears those talks never materialised in concrete deals.

More recently, however, Iberdrola executive chairman Ignacio Galán said that the developer would stick with established Western players for now, adding that penetrating the European market will “not be easy” for Chinese players.

"I think we are satisfied with our existing, traditional suppliers like Siemens Gamesa, Vestas etc,” he said. “We have been working together for more than 20 years.”

Iberdrola executive chairman Ignacio Galan.Photo: Iberdrola

Statkraft: ‘Chinese maturing rapidly’

Last year, Statkraft offshore wind chief David Flood told Recharge there is “no fundamental reason” why the Norwegian developer wouldn’t use Chinese offshore wind turbines.

This would be conditional on Chinese suppliers meeting “very high” company standards, he said. “That starts with safety and then follows up with sustainability, and then we move on to technical and commercial aspects as well."

“But Chinese manufacturers are maturing very rapidly on a lot of these aspects, so there's no reason why they couldn't potentially get up to the high standards that we require over time.”

EnBW: ‘A future possibility’

Another player in the UK’s offshore wind sector, EnBW’s finance chief Thomas Kusterer last year cited a small pool of Western turbine suppliers as a reason why the German utility could turn to the Chinese.
"It is indeed the case that we naturally only have a limited number of suppliers for wind turbines. This applies to onshore as well as offshore," news agency Reuters quoted Kusterer as saying.

"In the future, it would be a theoretical possibility to deal with Chinese manufacturers here. Yes, of course we have to do that, because it also has an economic component... However, this is not an issue for us at the moment.”

Luxcara: ‘A struggle without China’

Hamburg-based asset manager Luxcara entered into an agreement last year to use Mingyang turbines for an offshore wind project in the German North Sea.

However it dropped Mingyang for Siemens Gamesa in August, citing synergies with another of its nearby projects already using turbines from the German-owned supplier.
That notwithstanding, one of its project directors, Holger Matthiesen, has gone on the record to state that while Europe has plenty of “world class players” in its wind supply chain, the industry will “face challenges in the peak years” as markets across the continent race to hit targets around the end of the decade.

“Without China, in supply and sub-supply, it would be very difficult to meet the build out targets in Europe.”

(Copyright)
Published 14 October 2025, 08:05Updated 14 October 2025, 08:05
ChinaAsia-PacificEuropeUKMingYang Smart Energy