US offshore wind puts on brave face, but Trump victory 'doesn't bode well' for industry: analysts

Renewables advocates highlight growth of clean energy under president-elect's first term while opponents are bolstered by his sector antagonism

Liz Burdock, CEO of Oceantic Network.
Liz Burdock, CEO of Oceantic Network.Photo: oceantic

Offshore wind groups put on a brave face on Donald Trump's election as US president amid fears his administration would halt federal permitting and leasing, moves that could discourage supply chain investment over the next four years.

Liz Burdock, CEO of Oceantic Network, congratulated the president-elect on his “historic political comeback” and credited him with kickstarting an industry closely associated with Joe Biden, who will leave office 20 January.

“Eight years ago, the first Trump administration laid out the fundamental framework for our modern offshore wind industry,” Burdock said, noting that seven offshore wind leases were sold, netting the federal government $456m and sparking what now stands at $40bn in supply chain investments.

“With President Trump in office, we have the opportunity to harness even more investment and measurable economic benefits for communities across the country,” she added.

American Clean Power Association (ACP) was equally optimistic that renewable energy would flourish under Trump.

“Our industry grew by double digits each year under the first Trump Administration and has accelerated this rate of progress since,” said ACP CEO Jason Grumet.

“We are committed to working with the Trump-Vance Administration and the new Congress to continue this great American success story.”

Despite the professed optimism, Trump has taken aim at wind power in general and offshore wind in particular, vowing to halt that industry “on day one” of his final term.

Biden's industry

US offshore wind launched in 2005 under former Republican president George W. Bush, with sector leasing beginning in 2014 under Barack Obama, a Democrat.

Yet, the industry will be linked with Biden, who galvanised development with a 30GW by 2030 goal and extensive lease sales and project permitting.

His administration quickly approved Vineyard Wind 1, the nation’s first commercial-scale project, after denial of an environmental review by Trump regulators.

Lead federal regulator Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), which remained without a director for the duration of Trump’s first term, has under Biden approved 10 projects totalling some 15GW of capacity.

The administration has held six major lease sales on all three US coastlines and shepherded passage of the landmark climate legislation the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

Philip Totaro, CEO of research consultancy IntelStor, forecast that Trump’s near-term impacts would likely be “minimal if Biden can get lame duck approvals pushed through BOEM before January.”

He told Recharge, “I do not expect offshore projects already in the latter stages of development to be impacted too much right away.”

BOEM’s ambitious slate of 12 offshore wind auctions planned between 2025 – 2028 will likely not move forward, Totaro believes.

This will "stall out the market's growth potential and limit capital investments in factories because supply chain companies will not receive enough order book to justify the expenditure.”

Legal pullback

Another industry wild card is the spate of lawsuits against the federal government regarding its project approvals. Nearly all approved projects have attracted litigation which are defended by lawyers from the Department of Justice (DoJ) under direct control of the president.

So far all of the suits have been rejected by federal courts, but a Trump DoJ “will certainly be ordered to pull back from helping offshore wind developers, which means they could become mired in frivolous lawsuits trying to stall development projects,” said Totaro.

“Given what Trump has been saying about offshore wind, I don't think it bodes well for the future of the Vineyard Wind project or for any of the other offshore wind projects that are in various stages of development up and down the Atlantic coast,” said Ted Hadzi-Antich, senior attorney for conservative think tank Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF).

TPPF is representing a slate of fisheries associations and companies in a suit against BOEM’s approval of Vineyard Wind that is now in the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston, Massachusetts.
Amy DiSibio, media liaison for Nantucket-based activist group ACK-Rats, which has taken its own case against Vineyard to the Supreme Court, told Recharge: “We are hopeful that the new administration will take a much harder look at the destruction” they allege is caused by offshore wind development and “change gears”.

Paul Weiland, partner in law firm Nossaman’s Environment & Land Use practice, suggested that offshore wind won’t be a “high priority for a Trump White House relative to other policy areas.”

Weiland noted that key appointees, such as the leadership positions at Department of Interior, BOEM’s parent, and the DoJ “likely will be consequential”.

“Implications for offshore wind will depend substantially on the leadership team and their priorities,” he told Recharge.
(Copyright)
Published 6 November 2024, 22:28Updated 7 November 2024, 15:05
AmericasUSACPAOceantic Network